Justice
02/11/2011
Clubbing State
"I will cause to the state," said the prime minister. But he has never seen a head of government to sue the State? Yes, we have seen: Massimo D'Alema. It had the right and was also correct, because got a compensation of nine thousand euro (it was the procedure in relation to alleged bribery of red co-ops, which lasted too long and, therefore, detrimental to the defendants). That money is not paid them the magistrates responsible for the loss of time, we paid them to us taxpayers. It does not end here, because the law governing this matter, said Pinto, the name of the proposer (former Minister Romano Prodi), was approved in early 2001. That is the gestation coincided with the period when D'Alema ruled and ended in while at Palazzo Chigi was Giuliano Amato. The majority wanted it was to the left. It happened to others, using the latinorum of Obtuse, it would have defined "ad personam".
The people, however, nothing to do with anything, because that bad law, just as we define it, served to avoid being thrown out by the Council of Europe, since we had already been put on notice since the country longer condemned for violating human rights. The law in question was to have a fair trial in a reasonable time. Rather than remedying the problem, which consists of unfair trials and unreasonableness, that Parliament in the process of going home he decided to prevent the Italians to turn to Strasbourg, creating a further degree of internal assessment. Result, we expected: the Courts of Appeal have been flooded by local remedies; you do not respect even the time of this review, the state is in arrears and shame may be used against the long time the Pinto of Pinto. A shame. Cui
it adds another. Who is scandalized because Silvio Berlusconi intends "to sue the state" has forgotten the previous D'Alema, but both combined have forgotten the duty of legislators and rulers: to provide citizens with a functioning justice. Just as they have forgotten that the delays unacceptable and unjustifiable no remedy if there will ever not calling those responsible to pay, while, conversely, you let them to do so are taxpayers. Which, moreover, betrays the popular will, expressed in 1987, during a meritorious referendum promoted by the radicals: 80% of Italians voted for the civil liability of magistrates, but Parliament arranged to move from their shoulders to those of the exchequer. In theory the government might then retaliate against the person who created the damage (which is a violation of fundamental right), but does not proceed, for two reasons: a. because prosecutors contend that he never be able to identify with certainty, and b. because to claim the loss of revenue should be the Court of Auditors, which is a body, in turn, condemned for the same violation. The Corporation of the robes, therefore, with the complicity policy eternally under pressure and blackmail, he did Marameo the popular will.
Here is the scandal, not the fact that governors, former governors and legislators do more "due to the State." And it is a scandal from which it never will quit if not a bit of restoring dignity to the political and parliamentary reintroducing that immunity to help the trembling elected not to consider themselves servants of the corporation. It takes a month, all included for remedy. One month to clear twenty four years of betrayal of the popular will. A month that will flow in vain, humiliating to be towed from the political power of attorney papers.
http://www.davidegiacalone.it/giustizia/far-causa-allo-stato/
0 comments:
Post a Comment